
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Recording of Surveys</title>
<link>https://www.osls.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1296665</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 9 Jul 2026 05:16:24 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2016 Oklahoma Society of Land Surveyors</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.osls.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1296665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Recording of Surveys</title>
<link>https://www.osls.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1296665</link>
<guid>https://www.osls.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1296665</guid>
<description><![CDATA[.<font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">I personally would like to see legislation in Oklahoma for
recording Surveys. I have worked is various states that require recording of all
surveys. I feel that we should at least consider legislation requiring a survey
to be conducted and be recorded for any parcel that is segregated or subdivided
from a deeded parcel for the purpose of conveying ownership.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">This one item would be beneficial to property owners,
abstract / title companies, county assessors, etc. The recorded survey would
become a part of the documents in the “Chain of Title” for a parcel. I realize
that some of the metropolitan areas have zoning regulations that may address
this issue to some degree. The remainder of the state does not have such a mechanism
to protect property rights.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">I have spoken to Real Estate agents, County Assessors,
County Clerks who are very much in favor of such legislation. They are all
waiting on the Survey Profession to initiate the process for bringing about
legislation. &nbsp;</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 8pt;"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Where is our Society at on this issue? What are your
thoughts and felling on this?</font></p>
<div class="telerik_paste_container" style="border-width: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; left: 3px; top: 10px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow: hidden; position: absolute;"></div>
<div class="telerik_paste_container" style="border-width: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; left: 3px; top: 10px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow: hidden; position: absolute;"></div>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Sep 2016 04:13:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.osls.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1296699</link>
<guid>https://www.osls.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1296699</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The State Board of Licensure and the OSLS Board of Directors have formed a Task Force to discuss this an other issues.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:12:53 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.osls.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1314551</link>
<guid>https://www.osls.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1314551</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I came from a recording state (Washington). My opinion is Yes to Recording. There would have to be a reasonable fee, and review process. The benefit to us would be to see other surveyors work in a given area. We might agree more often, if we see they're logic.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
