
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Minimum Standards for Surveying</title>
<link>https://www.osls.org/forums/topics.aspx?forum=147374</link>
<description><![CDATA[Discussion of the Oklahoma Minimum Standards for the Practice of Land Surveying, including Mortgage Inspections and the Corner Perpetuation and Filing Act	]]></description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 9 Jul 2026 05:17:28 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jan 2016 19:36:13 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2016 Oklahoma Society of Land Surveyors</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.osls.org/forums/forum_rss.asp?id=147374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Chiseled &quot;X&quot; for a monument</title>
<link>https://www.osls.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=612594</link>
<guid>https://www.osls.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=612594</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2009 the State Board of Licensure clarified its position on the use a chiseled "X" as an appropriate monument.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Here is that position as reported by the State Board in 2009:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 205);">A CHISELED "X" DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR BOUNDARY SURVEYING UNLESS IT IS SOMEHOW MARKED WITH YOUR LICENSE NUMBER PURSUANT TO THE MINIMUM STANDARDS.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 205);">&nbsp;</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 205);">The problem is not with the "X" itself but that, typically,&nbsp;Land Surveyors have not had the means to affix their license number as required by the&nbsp;Minimum Standards so they set only an "X".&nbsp;This does not meet the minimum standards.&nbsp;</span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 205);">If a property corner is to be established in a concrete (or hard) surface there are basically two options:</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 205);"></span></p><ol><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 205);">Drill the surface sufficiently to mark the corner with any standard monument that allows the use of a cap or other marker with your LS number affixed.</span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 205);">Set a reference monument at a location near the corner and make&nbsp;a note of it on your drawing.</span></li></ol><div style="display: none" id="headerObjs">
        <h1>H1</h1>
        <h2>H2</h2>
        <h3>H3</h3>
        <h4>H4</h4>
        <h5>H5</h5>
        <h6>H6</h6>
    </div>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:11:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Certified Corner Record Form sketch</title>
<link>https://www.osls.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1186287</link>
<guid>https://www.osls.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1186287</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What makes a good (or not so good) sketch on a Certified Corner Record? <a href="https://osls.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/Docs/CCR_INSTRUCTION_MANUAL_2013_.pdf" target="_blank">The Instruction Manual for the Certified Corner Record</a> form only states the following:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>9. Sketch<br>
• Make a neat sketch showing the relative positions of the monument and reference points.<br>
• Give dimensions, with topographic features, names and widths of streets (if known)<br>
• North arrow<br>
• Show location of monuments at this corner which conflict with your position. Note if they are shown on previously filed Certified Corner Records.<br>
• To the extent possible, show the location of the supporting evidence in the sketch</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Should they be drawn to scale?</p>
<p>Should distances be horizontal or slope?</p>
<p>Should distances to the nearest GLO corners also be shown?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:36:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
